Search for: All records

Abstract The neural crest is vertebrate-specific stem cell population that helped drive the origin and evolution of the vertebrate clade. A distinguishing feature of these stem cells is their multi-germ layer potential, which has drawn developmental and evolutionary parallels to another stem cell population—pluripotent embryonic stem cells (animal pole cells or ES cells) of the vertebrate blastula. Here, we investigate the evolutionary origins of neural crest potential by comparing neural crest and pluripotency gene regulatory networks (GRNs) in both jawed (Xenopus) and jawless (lamprey) vertebrates. Through comparative gene expression analysis and transcriptomics, we reveal an ancient evolutionary origin of shared regulatory factors between neural crest and pluripotency GRNs that dates back to the last common ancestor of extant vertebrates. Focusing on the key pluripotency factorpou5(formerly oct4), we show that the lamprey genome encodes apou5ortholog that is expressed in animal pole cells, as in jawed vertebrates, but is absent from the neural crest. However, gain-of-function experiments show that both lamprey andXenopus pou5enhance neural crest formation, suggesting thatpou5was lost from the neural crest of jawless vertebrates. Finally, we show thatpou5is required for neural crest specification in jawed vertebrates and that it acquired novel neural crest-enhancing activity after evolving from an ancestralpou3-like clade that lacks this functionality. We propose that a pluripotency-neural crest GRN was assembled in stem vertebrates and that the multi-germ layer potential of the neural crest evolved by deploying this regulatory program. 

Abstract Background During embryogenesis, the developmental potential of initially pluripotent cells becomes progressively restricted as they transit to lineage restricted states. The pluripotent cells of  Xenopus  blastula-stage embryos are an ideal system in which to study cell state transitions during developmental decision-making, as gene expression dynamics can be followed at high temporal resolution. Results Here we use transcriptomics to interrogate the process by which pluripotent cells transit to four different lineage-restricted states: neural progenitors, epidermis, endoderm and ventral mesoderm, providing quantitative insights into the dynamics of Waddington’s landscape. Our findings provide novel insights into why the neural progenitor state is the default lineage state for pluripotent cells and uncover novel components of lineage-specific gene regulation. These data reveal an unexpected overlap in the transcriptional responses to BMP4/7 and Activin signaling and provide mechanistic insight into how the timing of signaling inputs such as BMP are temporally controlled to ensure correct lineage decisions. Conclusions Together these analyses provide quantitative insights into the logic and dynamics of developmental decision making in early embryos. They also provide valuable lineage-specific time series data following the acquisition of specific lineage states during development. 

During embryogenesis, the developmental potential of initially pluripotent cells becomes progressively restricted as they transit to lineage restricted states. The pluripotent cells of Xenopus blastula-stage embryos are an ideal system in which to study cell state transitions during developmental decision-making, as gene expression dynamics can be followed at high temporal resolution. Here we use transcriptomics to interrogate the process by which pluripotent cells transit to four different lineage-restricted states: neural progenitors, epidermis, endoderm and ventral mesoderm, providing quantitative insights into the dynamics of Waddington’s landscape. Our findings shed light on why the neural progenitor state is the default lineage state for pluripotent cells, and uncover novel components of lineage-specific gene regulation. These data reveal an unexpected overlap in the transcriptional responses to BMP4/7 and activin signaling, and provide mechanistic insight into how the timing of signaling inputs such as BMP are temporally controlled to ensure correct lineage decisions. Together these analyses provide quantitative insights into the logic and dynamics of developmental decision making in early embryos. 

ABSTRACT The field of developmental biology has declined in prominence in recent decades, with off-shoots from the field becoming more fashionable and highly funded. This has created inequity in discovery and opportunity, partly due to the perception that the field is antiquated or not cutting edge. A ‘think tank’ of scientists from multiple developmental biology-related disciplines came together to define specific challenges in the field that may have inhibited innovation, and to provide tangible solutions to some of the issues facing developmental biology. The community suggestions include a call to the community to help ‘rebrand’ the field, alongside proposals for additional funding apparatuses, frameworks for interdisciplinary innovative collaborations, pedagogical access, improved science communication, increased diversity and inclusion, and equity of resources to provide maximal impact to the community.